- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
The Convenient Constitution
Well now we've got something to be outraged about.
Deval Patrick hasn't even been sworn in yet, and he's advocating that the Constitutional Convention violate the law.
Gov.-elect Deval Patrick urged legislators today to end debate on a ballot initiative seeking to ban gay marriage by whatever means they deem appropriate, saying the matter involves a question of minority rights that should not be put to a popular vote.
“It is a terrible precedent for us to use the ballot initiative petition to insert discrimination into the Constitution,” Patrick told reporters after a private meeting with House Speaker Sal DiMasi, a leading opponent of the proposed ban....
Patrick said he does not believe lawmakers must vote on the question directly, even after a Supreme Judicial Court ruled last week that they have a constitutional obligation to do so.
“I think there is more than one constitutional question before us,” he said. “There is a constitutional issue of whether under the equal protection clause the court gets final word about the rights and the equality of a minority.”
Wow. That's some stunning logic coming from such a smart guy.
There is only one constitutional question. Whether the legislators have a constitutional duty to vote. The SJC unanimously said they did. That was their "final word."
And the Court's "final word" on gay marriage was interpreting the language of the original state constituion, which is, by its terms, subject to change by the citizens. The SJC did not rule on the ultimate Big "C" constitutionality of a gay marriage ban.
So here is our very first indication that Patrick is no centrist but a committed liberal ideologue to whom the means justify the end.
Shame on him.
UPDATE: Well will wonders never cease. The conscience-wracked legislature appears to have ignored the entreaty of the Governor-elect and actually done their duty. Hats off to them.
Deval Patrick hasn't even been sworn in yet, and he's advocating that the Constitutional Convention violate the law.
Gov.-elect Deval Patrick urged legislators today to end debate on a ballot initiative seeking to ban gay marriage by whatever means they deem appropriate, saying the matter involves a question of minority rights that should not be put to a popular vote.
“It is a terrible precedent for us to use the ballot initiative petition to insert discrimination into the Constitution,” Patrick told reporters after a private meeting with House Speaker Sal DiMasi, a leading opponent of the proposed ban....
Patrick said he does not believe lawmakers must vote on the question directly, even after a Supreme Judicial Court ruled last week that they have a constitutional obligation to do so.
“I think there is more than one constitutional question before us,” he said. “There is a constitutional issue of whether under the equal protection clause the court gets final word about the rights and the equality of a minority.”
Wow. That's some stunning logic coming from such a smart guy.
There is only one constitutional question. Whether the legislators have a constitutional duty to vote. The SJC unanimously said they did. That was their "final word."
And the Court's "final word" on gay marriage was interpreting the language of the original state constituion, which is, by its terms, subject to change by the citizens. The SJC did not rule on the ultimate Big "C" constitutionality of a gay marriage ban.
So here is our very first indication that Patrick is no centrist but a committed liberal ideologue to whom the means justify the end.
Shame on him.
UPDATE: Well will wonders never cease. The conscience-wracked legislature appears to have ignored the entreaty of the Governor-elect and actually done their duty. Hats off to them.