- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Friday, December 29, 2006
The Bloom Is Off This Ivy
In the most recent instance of political correctness run amok on the campuses of America's finest universities, one Josie Harper, the Dartmouth College Athletic Director, has taken it upon herself to apologize to the Dartmouth College student body due to the upcoming men's hockey face-off between Dartmouth and the University of North Dakota's Fighting Sioux:
Josie Harper, Dartmouth's athletic director, wrote a letter to the student newspaper, The Dartmouth, last month about the game, saying: "I must offer a sincere apology to the Native American community and the Dartmouth community as a whole for an event that will understandably offend and hurt people within our community."
Dartmouth, in Hanover, N.H., has decided to set up a committee that will consider whether the school should refuse to compete against teams that use Native American nicknames and mascots....
...Harper called the University of North Dakota's use of a Native American symbol "offensive and wrong."
No word on whether or not Harper is, herself, a member of the Sioux Nation, but it doesn't seem to matter to her that the Fighting Sioux's emblem was designed by a Native American and that, at least in North Dakota, the Sioux don't have any problem with it. Does anyone else really have any say in the matter?
This incident follows the original controversy in which that ever-reliable bastion of diversity, the NCAA, instituted its policy against the "hostile or abusive" use of American Indian names, mascots and imagery:
"But as a national association, we believe that mascots, nicknames or images deemed hostile or abusive in terms of race, ethnicity or national origin should not be visible at the championship events that we control."
See the problem? Deemed by whom to be hostile or abusive? The non-Native American athletic director at Dartmouth? Any fan? Or does one have to be a member of the "abused" tribe to have standing to "deem" the emblem offensive?
I wonder if Ms. Harper sought the input of any members of the Sioux Nation before she sought to defend their sensibilities.
If I were a Dartmouth graduate, I'd be mortified by this nonsense.
Josie Harper, Dartmouth's athletic director, wrote a letter to the student newspaper, The Dartmouth, last month about the game, saying: "I must offer a sincere apology to the Native American community and the Dartmouth community as a whole for an event that will understandably offend and hurt people within our community."
Dartmouth, in Hanover, N.H., has decided to set up a committee that will consider whether the school should refuse to compete against teams that use Native American nicknames and mascots....
...Harper called the University of North Dakota's use of a Native American symbol "offensive and wrong."
No word on whether or not Harper is, herself, a member of the Sioux Nation, but it doesn't seem to matter to her that the Fighting Sioux's emblem was designed by a Native American and that, at least in North Dakota, the Sioux don't have any problem with it. Does anyone else really have any say in the matter?
This incident follows the original controversy in which that ever-reliable bastion of diversity, the NCAA, instituted its policy against the "hostile or abusive" use of American Indian names, mascots and imagery:
"But as a national association, we believe that mascots, nicknames or images deemed hostile or abusive in terms of race, ethnicity or national origin should not be visible at the championship events that we control."
See the problem? Deemed by whom to be hostile or abusive? The non-Native American athletic director at Dartmouth? Any fan? Or does one have to be a member of the "abused" tribe to have standing to "deem" the emblem offensive?
I wonder if Ms. Harper sought the input of any members of the Sioux Nation before she sought to defend their sensibilities.
If I were a Dartmouth graduate, I'd be mortified by this nonsense.