- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Monday, May 15, 2006
State Legislators Back Wind Farm
[this press release was mentioned in the previous post, but it deserves a post of its own!]
The following press release was issued from the office of Representative Frank Smizik, House Chairman of the Joint Committee on the Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture:
The following press release was issued from the office of Representative Frank Smizik, House Chairman of the Joint Committee on the Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture:
69 MEMBERS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS LEGISLATURE URGE
CONGRESS TO DEFEAT THE ANTI-CAPE WIND PROVISION
BOSTON, MA, MAY 15, 2006 – Sixty-nine Members of the Massachusetts Legislature, madeup of members from both Chambers and political parties including Senate and House CommitteeChairs, sent a letter today to the U.S. Congress stating their opposition to the anti-Cape Wind provision that was attached in Conference to the Coast Guard Reauthorization Act.
Cape Wind is a project to place wind turbines six miles off the shore in Nantucket Sound. The proposal calls for an offshore grid of 130 wind turbines that would stand 400 feet above the water. The 420-megawatt project would replace about 113 million gallons of oil per year, supply 75 percent of the energy needs of the Cape, Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard and cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The Letter was prepared by Frank I. Smizik, Chairman of the House Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture and Representative of the 15th Norfolk District.
Chairman Smizik stated, “This letter makes it perfectly clear that there is substantial support for Cape Wind in the Massachusetts Legislature and strong opposition to the move in Congress by the Alaskan delegation to interfere with Massachusetts energy policies.” “In Massachusetts, the Legislature has assigned the authority to approve major energy proposals to the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board, and not to the Governor, in light of the special public interest in maintaining adequate energy supplies”, Smizik continued.
Chairman Smizik also said, “The Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board approved Cape Wind’s application last year based on the finding that it would reduce energy prices, reduce air pollution, provide needed power and help Massachusetts fulfill our policy mandate for more renewable energy.” “Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens last week stated on the Senate Floor that he was pushing his anti-Cape Wind provision to protect Massachusetts and its citizens – today we are sending a resounding message back to Washington that Stevens’ move is against the wishes of the Massachusetts Legislature and of the overwhelming majority of Massachusetts citizens,” Smizik continued. “Our citizens want reliable, affordable, clean energy and Cape Wind can provide it.”
Matt Patrick, Representative of the 3rd Barnstable District which includes the shoreline nearest to the proposed offshore wind turbines, said, "We would be remiss if we let the gross inaccuracies from the opponents of the Cape Wind project justify the illicit amendment to kill the project.” Patrick continued, “The allegations from the opposition cannot be documented. The review process involving 18 agencies and numerous public hearings over the past 4 years have documented the positive benefits of the project in direct contradiction to the allegations from opponents.” “Let the process go forward and if Cape Wind survives based on its merits, it should not be subject to the arbitrary whims of the Governor”, Patrick continued.
Last week, the State House News Service reported the results of their statewide poll of Massachusetts voters that found 71% support Cape Wind and only 17% oppose it.
# # #
BOSTON, MA, MAY 15, 2006 – Sixty-nine Members of the Massachusetts Legislature, madeup of members from both Chambers and political parties including Senate and House CommitteeChairs, sent a letter today to the U.S. Congress stating their opposition to the anti-Cape Wind provision that was attached in Conference to the Coast Guard Reauthorization Act.
Cape Wind is a project to place wind turbines six miles off the shore in Nantucket Sound. The proposal calls for an offshore grid of 130 wind turbines that would stand 400 feet above the water. The 420-megawatt project would replace about 113 million gallons of oil per year, supply 75 percent of the energy needs of the Cape, Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard and cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The Letter was prepared by Frank I. Smizik, Chairman of the House Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture and Representative of the 15th Norfolk District.
Chairman Smizik stated, “This letter makes it perfectly clear that there is substantial support for Cape Wind in the Massachusetts Legislature and strong opposition to the move in Congress by the Alaskan delegation to interfere with Massachusetts energy policies.” “In Massachusetts, the Legislature has assigned the authority to approve major energy proposals to the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board, and not to the Governor, in light of the special public interest in maintaining adequate energy supplies”, Smizik continued.
Chairman Smizik also said, “The Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board approved Cape Wind’s application last year based on the finding that it would reduce energy prices, reduce air pollution, provide needed power and help Massachusetts fulfill our policy mandate for more renewable energy.” “Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens last week stated on the Senate Floor that he was pushing his anti-Cape Wind provision to protect Massachusetts and its citizens – today we are sending a resounding message back to Washington that Stevens’ move is against the wishes of the Massachusetts Legislature and of the overwhelming majority of Massachusetts citizens,” Smizik continued. “Our citizens want reliable, affordable, clean energy and Cape Wind can provide it.”
Matt Patrick, Representative of the 3rd Barnstable District which includes the shoreline nearest to the proposed offshore wind turbines, said, "We would be remiss if we let the gross inaccuracies from the opponents of the Cape Wind project justify the illicit amendment to kill the project.” Patrick continued, “The allegations from the opposition cannot be documented. The review process involving 18 agencies and numerous public hearings over the past 4 years have documented the positive benefits of the project in direct contradiction to the allegations from opponents.” “Let the process go forward and if Cape Wind survives based on its merits, it should not be subject to the arbitrary whims of the Governor”, Patrick continued.
Last week, the State House News Service reported the results of their statewide poll of Massachusetts voters that found 71% support Cape Wind and only 17% oppose it.
# # #
Sometimes you just gotta feel proud.
HAT TIP: WIND FARMERS ALMANAC