- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
King of One's Castle
The guys from New Hampshire are always kicking Massachusetts' reputation for socialism. So is the rest of the country, but since the Boston Globe is practically the paper of record for the south counties there, the denizens of Rockingham are reminded of our liberalism on a daily basis.
Well I have some crow for them to nibble, because the Massachusetts General Court actually passed a law that was pushed by the rental housing property owners!! That's right, folks. The legislature supported landlords.
From now on, landlords will be permitted to actually charge tenants for their water usage.
(pausing for effect)
It is understandable that most people would not realize that, before this moment, they were not allowed to. But that shouldn't surprise you.
Prior to the passage of this law, residential rental property owners were not permitted to separately meter their apartments, not to charge their tenants separately for water usage. The landlord was required to be the customer of the water company, and was not allowed to demand reimbursement from tenants. Water came with the apartment. Just one of the many radically pro-tenant laws here in Massachusetts.
What a sweet victory, huh?!?
Lest we savor this victory too quickly, allow me to bring you crashing back to earth.
First of all, victories like this are not easy, and they do not come without sacrifices. It took the rental housing owners seventeen years to get this bill passed.
Seventeen years.
What's more, here are the list of limitations and conditions that very nearly snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Here are a few:
Well I have some crow for them to nibble, because the Massachusetts General Court actually passed a law that was pushed by the rental housing property owners!! That's right, folks. The legislature supported landlords.
From now on, landlords will be permitted to actually charge tenants for their water usage.
(pausing for effect)
It is understandable that most people would not realize that, before this moment, they were not allowed to. But that shouldn't surprise you.
Prior to the passage of this law, residential rental property owners were not permitted to separately meter their apartments, not to charge their tenants separately for water usage. The landlord was required to be the customer of the water company, and was not allowed to demand reimbursement from tenants. Water came with the apartment. Just one of the many radically pro-tenant laws here in Massachusetts.
What a sweet victory, huh?!?
Lest we savor this victory too quickly, allow me to bring you crashing back to earth.
First of all, victories like this are not easy, and they do not come without sacrifices. It took the rental housing owners seventeen years to get this bill passed.
Seventeen years.
What's more, here are the list of limitations and conditions that very nearly snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Here are a few:
- Existing tenants are exempt, even tenants at will. Not until a physical change of occupancy occurs can a unit be separately metered and billed.
- Water charges must be included in a written lease. No lease, no water charges.
- The meters cannot be installed until all water outlets are (a) installed with "water conservation devices" (meeting maximum flow rate limits) and (b) certified by the local board of health.
- All installations must be performed and certified by licensed plummers (at the owners' expense).
- The landlord must remain the utility customer and separately bill each tenant. If the tenant doesn't pay, the landlord has to hassle with eviction remedies.
Hardly seems worth the seventeen years of effort and expense, but here in the newly pro-landlord Commonwealth of Masaachusetts, we take our victories as we can get 'em!