- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Gee Thanks Dude!!
[Hey welcome fellow Wizbang readers -- enjoy the visit]
Even though I am a lawyer, I have more often than not questioned the propriety of class-action law suits in which members of the "victim" plaintiff class may receive pennies (literally) while the plaintiff-class attorneys receive millions for themselves. As one who did a fair amount of investing during the 1980's and 1990's, I have received my share of "Notice of Class Action" announcements, explaining that if I met certain characteristics of the "class," I could register as a class member at no out-of-pocket cost to me. For pure amusement, in one instance only (one in which I had actually lost a considerable sum of money), I entered the class and several years later, I received a check for $34.17 (for my $3,000 loss), while the class attorneys collected some $17.5 million.
Outrageous, right?
Well apparently the plaintiff class lawyers in Texas are running low on victims.
As reported a long while ago at Overlawyered:
"Houston attorney David George has filed intended class-action lawsuits on behalf of local resident Paul Brian Meekey against three strip clubs, claiming the clubs violated Texas law by adding a $5 credit card surcharge to the $20 price of a lap dance. The suit demands a refund of all such charges paid over the past four years, plus attorney's fees. According to attorney George, state law flatly forbids merchants from imposing surcharges on credit card transactions, even, presumably, in cases where those transactions are costly for merchants to provide because of a high later dispute rate. "Another lawyer tried filing similar cases in 1999 but abandoned them, in part out of fear that clients would only be angry when they received notice at home about refunds."
After a lower court dismissed the lawsuit on procedural grounds, we learn (via The Slithery D) that the Texas Court of Appeals has ruled that the suit may proceed, and now the enterprising plaintiff class lawyers have some nettlesome work ahead of them:
"That could mean notifying a lot of other men who used credit cards to pay for lap dances in recent years.
"And that might not go over very well in some households.
"'They are going to want the (strip) clubs' credit card companies to give them the names of all the different people who have charged dances there,' said Albert Van Huff, attorney for several of the clubs."
A few questions come to mind:
Even though I am a lawyer, I have more often than not questioned the propriety of class-action law suits in which members of the "victim" plaintiff class may receive pennies (literally) while the plaintiff-class attorneys receive millions for themselves. As one who did a fair amount of investing during the 1980's and 1990's, I have received my share of "Notice of Class Action" announcements, explaining that if I met certain characteristics of the "class," I could register as a class member at no out-of-pocket cost to me. For pure amusement, in one instance only (one in which I had actually lost a considerable sum of money), I entered the class and several years later, I received a check for $34.17 (for my $3,000 loss), while the class attorneys collected some $17.5 million.
Outrageous, right?
Well apparently the plaintiff class lawyers in Texas are running low on victims.
As reported a long while ago at Overlawyered:
"Houston attorney David George has filed intended class-action lawsuits on behalf of local resident Paul Brian Meekey against three strip clubs, claiming the clubs violated Texas law by adding a $5 credit card surcharge to the $20 price of a lap dance. The suit demands a refund of all such charges paid over the past four years, plus attorney's fees. According to attorney George, state law flatly forbids merchants from imposing surcharges on credit card transactions, even, presumably, in cases where those transactions are costly for merchants to provide because of a high later dispute rate. "Another lawyer tried filing similar cases in 1999 but abandoned them, in part out of fear that clients would only be angry when they received notice at home about refunds."
After a lower court dismissed the lawsuit on procedural grounds, we learn (via The Slithery D) that the Texas Court of Appeals has ruled that the suit may proceed, and now the enterprising plaintiff class lawyers have some nettlesome work ahead of them:
"That could mean notifying a lot of other men who used credit cards to pay for lap dances in recent years.
"And that might not go over very well in some households.
"'They are going to want the (strip) clubs' credit card companies to give them the names of all the different people who have charged dances there,' said Albert Van Huff, attorney for several of the clubs."
A few questions come to mind:
- Who is foolish (or drunk) enough to pay for a lap dance with a credit card?
- How many lap dances does it take to make this law suit is "worth the trouble?"
- Which lawyers are behind this -- class action attorneys or divorce lawyers (or both, wink wink)?
And finally...
- How many "gentlemen" are lining up right now for a shot at Houston Attorney David George?