- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Friday, April 22, 2005
The Senator's New In-law
I really wasn't paying attention to the news yesterday. I couldn't have been.
I did note the very small, one column inch story buried in the Globe about Ray Reggie, the brother of Senator Kennedy's wife, pleading guilty to bank fraud in a New Orleans federal court. My reaction was rather blase, as this was New Orleans, after all, and stories about politically-connected people committing fraud are almost trite. Kind of like a "Sun Comes Up" headline.
But as I've learned this morning (from doing my reading with more focus), the story of Ray Reggie is much more interesting than garden variety bank fraud. As the New York Sun reported this morning (and yesterday), the bank fraud case against Reggie began in 2001, and his plea deal was reached in 2002, but the charges and plea weren't filed publicly until February of 2005.
What's been going on during that expanse of time?
Why, "Raymond Reggie, has been operating in Democratic circles for the last three years as an undercover informant for the FBI...[as] part of an FBI plan to secretly audiotape conversations with political operatives, including a well-known person who prosecutors said was seeking to funnel donations from foreigners to federal campaigns."
Isn't that special?
For all of the intrigue of the story, however, I find one of the more mundane elements of it the most amusing:
"Reggie also faces a separate, unrelated state trial in Louisiana next month for allegedly impersonating a police officer. The felony charge stems from a 2002 incident in which Reggie allegedly used a blue light to stop another vehicle.
"'He pulls over a car full of young girls, tells them he's a cop; and wants one of them to get out; tried to get them to follow him somewhere,' the prosecutor handling the case, Kim McElwee, said in an interview.
"Ms. McElwee complained that she has had great difficulty obtaining routine evidence for the case. 'I've never had a case quite like this," she said. 'People say they have a document. I call back. Not only is the document gone, they're gone. It's bizarre.'
"Reggie, who has maintained his innocence, has waived his right to a jury trial. Ms. McElwee said the judge will probably acquit Reggie. 'I'm getting entertainment out of this. I'm certainly not going to get a conviction,' she said."
Entertainment indeed!
(Hat tip: Squaring the Globe)
Final thought: I wonder if the Reggies aren't a little annoyed with being referred to as "Kennedy in-laws." Granted, the moniker carries weighty implications, but I think after several generations of their own political chicanery, the Reggies are entitled to stand on their own name. Perhaps in New Orleans, Senator Kennedy is referred to as a "Reggie in-law."
I did note the very small, one column inch story buried in the Globe about Ray Reggie, the brother of Senator Kennedy's wife, pleading guilty to bank fraud in a New Orleans federal court. My reaction was rather blase, as this was New Orleans, after all, and stories about politically-connected people committing fraud are almost trite. Kind of like a "Sun Comes Up" headline.
But as I've learned this morning (from doing my reading with more focus), the story of Ray Reggie is much more interesting than garden variety bank fraud. As the New York Sun reported this morning (and yesterday), the bank fraud case against Reggie began in 2001, and his plea deal was reached in 2002, but the charges and plea weren't filed publicly until February of 2005.
What's been going on during that expanse of time?
Why, "Raymond Reggie, has been operating in Democratic circles for the last three years as an undercover informant for the FBI...[as] part of an FBI plan to secretly audiotape conversations with political operatives, including a well-known person who prosecutors said was seeking to funnel donations from foreigners to federal campaigns."
Isn't that special?
For all of the intrigue of the story, however, I find one of the more mundane elements of it the most amusing:
"Reggie also faces a separate, unrelated state trial in Louisiana next month for allegedly impersonating a police officer. The felony charge stems from a 2002 incident in which Reggie allegedly used a blue light to stop another vehicle.
"'He pulls over a car full of young girls, tells them he's a cop; and wants one of them to get out; tried to get them to follow him somewhere,' the prosecutor handling the case, Kim McElwee, said in an interview.
"Ms. McElwee complained that she has had great difficulty obtaining routine evidence for the case. 'I've never had a case quite like this," she said. 'People say they have a document. I call back. Not only is the document gone, they're gone. It's bizarre.'
"Reggie, who has maintained his innocence, has waived his right to a jury trial. Ms. McElwee said the judge will probably acquit Reggie. 'I'm getting entertainment out of this. I'm certainly not going to get a conviction,' she said."
Entertainment indeed!
(Hat tip: Squaring the Globe)
Final thought: I wonder if the Reggies aren't a little annoyed with being referred to as "Kennedy in-laws." Granted, the moniker carries weighty implications, but I think after several generations of their own political chicanery, the Reggies are entitled to stand on their own name. Perhaps in New Orleans, Senator Kennedy is referred to as a "Reggie in-law."