- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Saturday, April 23, 2005
Big Dog and Pony, Dig?
Well yesterday was a big day for the Big Dig, when the U. S. House Committee on Government Reform held a hearing into the pesky "leak" problems.
There was much finger-pointing (funny how the finger always points away from the body to which it belongs --- sort of an anatomical anomaly of politicians and those under investigation), but the remarks of USDOT Inspector General Kenneth M. Mead gave me something to crow about, and I'm gonna do it (in my usual understated fashion).
From the Boston Globe today:
Mead also suggested that the close relationship between the Turnpike Authority, the state agency that oversees the Big Dig, and project managers Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff led to a lack of proper oversight on the project. The Big Dig would have benefited from having an outside party charged with quality and cost control over the massive project, he said. ''What was fundamentally wrong here was the closeness," Mead said. ''What you had here was a partnership between Bechtel and the Turnpike Authority. You needed to have more checkers in place, from the beginning, on all these change orders."
In an earlier post, I described my meeting with a then-Big Dig attorney who informed me that the attorneys were instructed not to perform their oversight function. I said, "I can't help but wonder how the project might have turned out if a dozen lawyers at the Central Artery were allowed to do their jobs. "
Smart man, Mr. Mead.
Well the horse is out of the barn and half-way to Calgary, but the lesson is clear: An Owner's Representative should be a requirement of any federally-funded transportation project.
There was much finger-pointing (funny how the finger always points away from the body to which it belongs --- sort of an anatomical anomaly of politicians and those under investigation), but the remarks of USDOT Inspector General Kenneth M. Mead gave me something to crow about, and I'm gonna do it (in my usual understated fashion).
From the Boston Globe today:
Mead also suggested that the close relationship between the Turnpike Authority, the state agency that oversees the Big Dig, and project managers Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff led to a lack of proper oversight on the project. The Big Dig would have benefited from having an outside party charged with quality and cost control over the massive project, he said. ''What was fundamentally wrong here was the closeness," Mead said. ''What you had here was a partnership between Bechtel and the Turnpike Authority. You needed to have more checkers in place, from the beginning, on all these change orders."
In an earlier post, I described my meeting with a then-Big Dig attorney who informed me that the attorneys were instructed not to perform their oversight function. I said, "I can't help but wonder how the project might have turned out if a dozen lawyers at the Central Artery were allowed to do their jobs. "
Smart man, Mr. Mead.
Well the horse is out of the barn and half-way to Calgary, but the lesson is clear: An Owner's Representative should be a requirement of any federally-funded transportation project.