- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Thursday, April 21, 2005
Another Study Finds Serious Woes???
On the heels of the most recent revelation that the CDC over-estimated the number of obesity-related deaths by a factor of FOURTEEN, I am evermore leery of "studies," but this one deserves some special recognition.
So, the Boston Globe informs us, "Hub race woes serious, study finds."
Woah. Sixties bussing all over again? Uh, no. The story begins:
"Despite metro Boston's increasing diversity, 80 percent of African-Americans and roughly half of Hispanics polled recently said that racial discrimination remains a somewhat serious or very serious problem that can cost jobs or promotions and make others feel unwelcome at sporting events and shopping centers.
More than half of African-Americans and almost four of 10 Latinos said they face day-to-day discrimination at least a few times a month -- for instance, by being treated with less respect, offered worse service, or called names."
Less respect than what? Worse service than what? I have news for the participants of this "poll." Service is terrible everywhere. Service personnel have no respect for anyone. Get used to it!
Seriously, I couldn't help but wonder who made up these questions:
Q: Because of your race or ethnic background, how often have you felt out of place or unwelcome at...
a. Professional sports venues?
b. Museums?
c. Shopping areas?
d. Restaurants?
Not, "have you ever, and if so, how often."
And how does an ethnic person know that the "worse" service s/he is getting is because of...race or ethnicity?
And what does it mean to "feel out of place?" Or "unwelcomed?"
This is apparently a study on how 403 African-Americans and Hispanics feel, and that's valuable information to someone, I suppose. But it tells us nothing about what it is about the environment that makes them feel the way they do. And so, I think it is, at the very least, atrocious headline-writing for the Boston Globe to trumpet, at the top of the Metro section, HUB RACE WOES SERIOUS.
One of the authors of the study, Josephine Louie, lamented about the lack of integration in Boston communities:
"Not only do people live in seperate towns and neighborhoods, but they socialize in different places. You go to a symphony, it's a sea of white faces. You go to nightclubs, it's either all-white or all-latino or all-black."
I wonder if Ms/ Louie might be open to the notion that this is not because of deliberate racism on the part of whites, but simply because people of the same culture prefer to be together. And that's not a bad thing. In fact, there is this nugget in the back quarter of the article:
"Wilbur Rich, a Wellesley College professor of political science who reviewed the study before its release, said Boston is not unlike other cities. 'People are sort of escaping to be among folks in their class,' he said.
And he can relate, somewhat; as one of a smattering of black faces on campus, he lives in Wellesley but continues to go to a multiracial church in Cambridge, rather than seek an Episcopal congregation closer to home."
Now, is Professor Rish going to the Cambridge Church because he prefers to, or because he would feel "out of place" in a Wellesley Episcopal Church?
So, the Boston Globe informs us, "Hub race woes serious, study finds."
Woah. Sixties bussing all over again? Uh, no. The story begins:
"Despite metro Boston's increasing diversity, 80 percent of African-Americans and roughly half of Hispanics polled recently said that racial discrimination remains a somewhat serious or very serious problem that can cost jobs or promotions and make others feel unwelcome at sporting events and shopping centers.
More than half of African-Americans and almost four of 10 Latinos said they face day-to-day discrimination at least a few times a month -- for instance, by being treated with less respect, offered worse service, or called names."
Less respect than what? Worse service than what? I have news for the participants of this "poll." Service is terrible everywhere. Service personnel have no respect for anyone. Get used to it!
Seriously, I couldn't help but wonder who made up these questions:
Q: Because of your race or ethnic background, how often have you felt out of place or unwelcome at...
a. Professional sports venues?
b. Museums?
c. Shopping areas?
d. Restaurants?
Not, "have you ever, and if so, how often."
And how does an ethnic person know that the "worse" service s/he is getting is because of...race or ethnicity?
And what does it mean to "feel out of place?" Or "unwelcomed?"
This is apparently a study on how 403 African-Americans and Hispanics feel, and that's valuable information to someone, I suppose. But it tells us nothing about what it is about the environment that makes them feel the way they do. And so, I think it is, at the very least, atrocious headline-writing for the Boston Globe to trumpet, at the top of the Metro section, HUB RACE WOES SERIOUS.
One of the authors of the study, Josephine Louie, lamented about the lack of integration in Boston communities:
"Not only do people live in seperate towns and neighborhoods, but they socialize in different places. You go to a symphony, it's a sea of white faces. You go to nightclubs, it's either all-white or all-latino or all-black."
I wonder if Ms/ Louie might be open to the notion that this is not because of deliberate racism on the part of whites, but simply because people of the same culture prefer to be together. And that's not a bad thing. In fact, there is this nugget in the back quarter of the article:
"Wilbur Rich, a Wellesley College professor of political science who reviewed the study before its release, said Boston is not unlike other cities. 'People are sort of escaping to be among folks in their class,' he said.
And he can relate, somewhat; as one of a smattering of black faces on campus, he lives in Wellesley but continues to go to a multiracial church in Cambridge, rather than seek an Episcopal congregation closer to home."
Now, is Professor Rish going to the Cambridge Church because he prefers to, or because he would feel "out of place" in a Wellesley Episcopal Church?