- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Thursday, February 24, 2005
Self-Discovery Through Multiple Choice Questions
Closing in on fifty, I think that I have come to know myself pretty well by now. Most, but not all, of my self-assessments were empirically vaidated recently, however, when I succumbed -- purely out of curiosity -- to a couple of "personality tests." Taken in the course of my initiative to explore possible career options, one test (the "D.I.S.C. Assessment") proposed to assist me in recognizing both my own personality type and that of any prospective interviewer -- the idea being that when I am able to identify the personality type of my interviewer, I am able to modify my own behavior to take advantage of the situation. The other test, the "Thomas-Jung Personaility Profile," seeks to determine, by examination of a lengthy handwriting sample, the quality of an job applicant's character independently of his resume.
All of this sounds a little Orwellian to some, but personally, I think it's fun. Just think of how much easier it is to communicate with a job interviewer when both you and s/he have nothing to be coy about:
Hiring Party: "Soooooo, tell me about yourself!"
Applicant: "Well, D.I.S.C. scores me 93% on the I scale, and a -15% on the P scale, and Thomas-Jung scores me 33% Field Marshall, 33% Mastermind and 33% Strategist!"
"I see, well this position does require someone who is extroverted and people-oriented, charming, confident and enthusiastic, but I am concerned about your propensity to be late for meetings."
"Oh, well that aspect of the assessment was way off. I am habitually early for meetings and in fact am very annoyed by others that are late."
"Ah I see, a statistical anomaly in the methodology. Well of course, when you're the boss, there are great demands on you. You can't always be on time! How do you get along with dominant D's?"
"Well I can see from your posture and the way you sit at your desk that you are a dominant D, and I have always admired and respected people who make calculated, organized and well thought-out decisions."
"Now young man, while I appreciate your need to influence people, you know that I am only interested in results and winning."
"Of course -- you're sitting upright and using fast-paced speech and direct, clear words. I'd sure appreciate your showing me social recognition by offering me this job!"
"Well hiring is one of the tasks I am oriented toward, and since you are dissatisfied by rejection and haven't over-used data in this interview, I think I can assure you that I have made a winning decision. Let me stand up, lean forward and give you a strong handshake!"
"Thank you sir! This is fun and exciting! I very much look forward to pleasing you and others."
All of this sounds a little Orwellian to some, but personally, I think it's fun. Just think of how much easier it is to communicate with a job interviewer when both you and s/he have nothing to be coy about:
Hiring Party: "Soooooo, tell me about yourself!"
Applicant: "Well, D.I.S.C. scores me 93% on the I scale, and a -15% on the P scale, and Thomas-Jung scores me 33% Field Marshall, 33% Mastermind and 33% Strategist!"
"I see, well this position does require someone who is extroverted and people-oriented, charming, confident and enthusiastic, but I am concerned about your propensity to be late for meetings."
"Oh, well that aspect of the assessment was way off. I am habitually early for meetings and in fact am very annoyed by others that are late."
"Ah I see, a statistical anomaly in the methodology. Well of course, when you're the boss, there are great demands on you. You can't always be on time! How do you get along with dominant D's?"
"Well I can see from your posture and the way you sit at your desk that you are a dominant D, and I have always admired and respected people who make calculated, organized and well thought-out decisions."
"Now young man, while I appreciate your need to influence people, you know that I am only interested in results and winning."
"Of course -- you're sitting upright and using fast-paced speech and direct, clear words. I'd sure appreciate your showing me social recognition by offering me this job!"
"Well hiring is one of the tasks I am oriented toward, and since you are dissatisfied by rejection and haven't over-used data in this interview, I think I can assure you that I have made a winning decision. Let me stand up, lean forward and give you a strong handshake!"
"Thank you sir! This is fun and exciting! I very much look forward to pleasing you and others."