- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
More on Kids and Group Sex
In what has now become referred to as the "Milton Sex Case," the discussion has moved to whether or not the parents and the girl will "recommend that prosecutors press charges" against the five boys who received "benefits" from a 15 year old sophmore girl. Today's Boston Globe contains a follow-up story that has the following report:
"On campus, parents of some Milton Academy students said there is anger toward the girl, blaming her for the expulsion of the five boys."
Presumably, I'm thinking these are the parents of the boys, or of the boy's team mates or pals.
Let's review this: Girl and five boys do their thing. In the ensuing weeks, "word gets around" about what girl and boys did. Think for a minute. How did "word get around." Do you think the girl was spreading the story of her exploits? Or were the boys being boys --- or more accurately, the big-shot varsity hockey player boys -- snickering to their team mates about their ineffable good fortune? Cut me down for my supreme confidence, but I think the latter.
So then, this sounds crude, but thinking about the kids and parents who "blame the girl," I think crudeness is in order: If the poor expelled boys had kept their mouths shut, they'd still be going to their elite prep school, no one would be blaming anyone, and the Fabulous Five could go on with their priviledged lives smugly knowing that they have something in common with the 42d President of the United States.
And one fifteen year old girl would not be at home today, wondering how she moves on from here.
"On campus, parents of some Milton Academy students said there is anger toward the girl, blaming her for the expulsion of the five boys."
Presumably, I'm thinking these are the parents of the boys, or of the boy's team mates or pals.
Let's review this: Girl and five boys do their thing. In the ensuing weeks, "word gets around" about what girl and boys did. Think for a minute. How did "word get around." Do you think the girl was spreading the story of her exploits? Or were the boys being boys --- or more accurately, the big-shot varsity hockey player boys -- snickering to their team mates about their ineffable good fortune? Cut me down for my supreme confidence, but I think the latter.
So then, this sounds crude, but thinking about the kids and parents who "blame the girl," I think crudeness is in order: If the poor expelled boys had kept their mouths shut, they'd still be going to their elite prep school, no one would be blaming anyone, and the Fabulous Five could go on with their priviledged lives smugly knowing that they have something in common with the 42d President of the United States.
And one fifteen year old girl would not be at home today, wondering how she moves on from here.