- Blogroll Me!
-
Cognoscenti, Agents Provocateurs and Casual Acquaintances
- Ace of Spades
- Ambivablog
- Anchoress
- Ankle Biting Pundits
- Becker & Posner
- Betsy's Page
- Big Lizard
- Tim Blair
- Bullwinkle
- Crooked Timber
- Dean's World
- Drudge
- The Fourth Rail
- Hit & Run
- Instapundit
- Jot Sheet
- Lileks
- LittleGreenFootballs
- Michelle Malkin
- Megan McArdle
- Minority Report
- Myopic Zeal
- Outside the Beltway
- Patterico
- Powerline
- Rachel Lucas
- Real Clear Politics
- Shape of Days
- Straight White Guy
- TMH Bacon Bits
- Truth Laid Bear
- Velociworld
- Venomous Kate
- Vodkapundit
- WILLisms
- Wizbang
- Yippee-Ki-Yay!!
- Althouse
- Above the Law
- Anonymous Lawyer
- Beldar
- Legal Pad
- Lowering the Bar
- Orin Kerr
- Overlawyered
- Point of Law
- Prof. Ribstein
- Rule of Law
- Volokh
- Jim Morin's Cartoons
- Cape Cod Chowder
- DaleyBlog
- Hub Blog
- Hub Politics
- Left Wing Escapee
- mASSbackwards
- Mass Federalist
- The Modern American
- Pundit Review
- Squaring the Boston Globe
- Sudden Stop
- Toys in the Attic
- Universal Hub
- Weekend Pundit
- Weekly Dig
- Mark Coffey
- Polipundit
- Scurvy Wench (Arrrrgh)
- Strata-sphere
- Tiger Hawk
- Viking Pundit
- Modern Drunkard Magazine
- Phat Phree
- Point Five
- Totally Absurd Archives
- Utter Wonder
- Oronte Churm
Truly Different/Et Alia
- Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
- Post Secret
- Jargon Database
- Detail Cops
- My Landscaping Adventure
- Pick It Up
- Motor Scooters & Brooms
- Be Careful What You Wish For
- Scaling the Pinnacle of Lunacy
- Pervis the Great Fisherman
- Partisan Politics & Filibusters
- On Morality & Hard Cases
- Spending Republican STyle
- And So It Begins
- Politics of Roe Reversal
- One Collosal Fraud
- Crybabies In Texas
- Reflections on Alito Hearings
- Real Lobbying Reforms
- Gerrymander Rules
- Bare Knuckles In The Limelight
- Limelight Fades to Black
- Bar Business Boston-style
- Big Mess, Dig
- Another Kennedy Tragedy
- Joan Plays Ball
- World Class My Ass
- Hot Air
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
My BestWork
Humor
National Politics
Boston Politics
Archives
Law Blogs
Pulitzer Prize-winning Cartoonists
New England Bloggahs
Coalition of the Chillin
(Partial List)
Humor
THIS IS MY VIRTUAL LIVING ROOM. COME ON IN AND SAY HELLO. THE BAR IS OVER IN THE CORNER -- HELP YOURSELF, BUT MIND YOUR MANNERS.
Friday, February 18, 2005
Detail Cops
This business of police officers doing traffic details at construction sites is driving me crazy. At first blush, you might think it's not a bad idea. There are a lot of tools on a construction site, and tools are expensive. Having a cop there to deter theft can keep construction costs down.
There is also the lunch wagon. All that food right out on the street and only one guy to watch three sides of his truck. Fast food thieves cause havoc to all law abiding lunch crowds.
Oh, okay. I understand that real police officers are necessary for "traffic control." I've seen it first hand. If you see a line of stopped traffic near a road project, you can be sure there's a cop controlling it. I was stuck in a conga line the other day. When it finally started moving and passed the work site, there was the cop, in his bright orange vest. He was directing traffic while he was talking on his cell phone. And he must have been Italian, because he was waving his arms and hands a lot. This can be confusing to commuting drivers who are on cell phones themselves.
Now law enforcement organizations have been advocating a ban on driving with cell phones. I have a couple of theories as to why. One is that the cops on cell phones are talking to their driving spouses. The other is that drivers on cell phones are too dangerous when being directed by cops on cell phones, and the right to talk on cell phones is covered under a collective bargaining agreement.
That's not entirely fair though. Sometimes the cops aren't directing traffic while on their phones. Usually, they're just sitting in their private vehicles, on their phones or just reading a tabloid. Time-and-a-half for reading in a cozy vehicle - sometimes, late-model foreign cars that are way out of my price range.
It is for reasons like this that law enforcement organizations suggest that traffic detailing is "too dangerous to leave to civilians."
They may be right. When I see a cop directing traffic while he's talking on a cell phone, I'm afraid of losing control of my vehicle.
There is also the lunch wagon. All that food right out on the street and only one guy to watch three sides of his truck. Fast food thieves cause havoc to all law abiding lunch crowds.
Oh, okay. I understand that real police officers are necessary for "traffic control." I've seen it first hand. If you see a line of stopped traffic near a road project, you can be sure there's a cop controlling it. I was stuck in a conga line the other day. When it finally started moving and passed the work site, there was the cop, in his bright orange vest. He was directing traffic while he was talking on his cell phone. And he must have been Italian, because he was waving his arms and hands a lot. This can be confusing to commuting drivers who are on cell phones themselves.
Now law enforcement organizations have been advocating a ban on driving with cell phones. I have a couple of theories as to why. One is that the cops on cell phones are talking to their driving spouses. The other is that drivers on cell phones are too dangerous when being directed by cops on cell phones, and the right to talk on cell phones is covered under a collective bargaining agreement.
That's not entirely fair though. Sometimes the cops aren't directing traffic while on their phones. Usually, they're just sitting in their private vehicles, on their phones or just reading a tabloid. Time-and-a-half for reading in a cozy vehicle - sometimes, late-model foreign cars that are way out of my price range.
It is for reasons like this that law enforcement organizations suggest that traffic detailing is "too dangerous to leave to civilians."
They may be right. When I see a cop directing traffic while he's talking on a cell phone, I'm afraid of losing control of my vehicle.